Re: KDC model and atomicity
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:36:00 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Nico" == Nico Williams <[email protected]> writes: Nico> At most? As long as it isn't "at least". >> Same deal with timestamp of last successful/unsuccessful/attempt. <hat role="individual"> I'm actually quite uncomfortable standardizing three sets of semantics here. That doesn't provide a very reasonable management experience. Given the number of KDC implementations out there, it effectively means that there will be no interoperability. If we can't narrow beyond that, why not drop the feature as something where we cannot agree on standard behavior? _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg