Re: KDC model and atomicity
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:16:50 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/26/2012 12:57 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: >>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > Given that, a minimalist approach would be to: > > Mark 4.1.1.5 through 4.1.1.8 as OPTIONAL. > > * Add a note to 4.1.1.4 indicating that schemas MUST have a > mechanism for re-enabling a principal that has been disabled > through operational mechanisms such as account lock out. ftr I'm fine with this -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/pmh4ACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnchUwCePz5IDYj+RS4GzGVq4f/VZ+xd CowAn2AXTeuS2N2wVy04Uwti5/7aKoQB =FiUl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg