Re: KDC model and atomicity

Leif Johansson <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:16:50 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.krb-wg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/26/2012 12:57 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Given that, a minimalist approach would be to:
> 
> Mark 4.1.1.5 through 4.1.1.8 as OPTIONAL.
> 
> * Add a note to 4.1.1.4 indicating that schemas MUST have a
> mechanism for re-enabling a principal that has been disabled
> through operational mechanisms such as account lock out.

ftr I'm fine with this

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/pmh4ACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnchUwCePz5IDYj+RS4GzGVq4f/VZ+xd
CowAn2AXTeuS2N2wVy04Uwti5/7aKoQB
=FiUl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg