Re: KDC model and atomicity

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/26/2012 05:15 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> "Greg" == Greg Hudson <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> Greg> On 06/26/2012 06:57 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>> Mark 4.1.1.5 through 4.1.1.8 as OPTIONAL.
> 
> Greg> I would rather remove them than have text which we expect
> most people to Greg> ignore.  But if there isn't consensus for
> that, I'm minimally okay with Greg> marking them as optional.
> 
> Can I get comments on this?

I disagree. Optional attributes are perfectly reasonable and they
serve as important advise on how to implement an attribute should
you choose to do so.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/p1oMACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnfSIwCgoh0AyepZvdtlH5XudFEkvvYI
gFAAoIGFM9rDneLnMFYxd9w2mi9FRgXA
=X367
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg