Re: KDC model and atomicity
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:27:38 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Henry" == Henry B Hotz <[email protected]> writes: Henry> I'm in favor of a "locked" attribute, and a reset operation. There's clearly no consensus for anything beyond that. Henry> On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Nico Williams wrote: I'm much more comfortable saying that schemas must have a way to unlock than I am introducing a locked attribute. My rationale is that it ducks the attribute vs operation question to the schema where it belongs. I am OK with a locked attribute. I'm OK removing all mention of this stuff. I'm OK making stuff optional. _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg