Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model

Sam Hartman <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi.
> At this point in the process, there's a presumption that absent
> consensus to change, the text currently in the draft will survive.
>
> Unfortunately, we're in an annoying situation. I think we have a rough
> consensus that the text in the draft is not what we want. I think Simo,
> Nico, Leif, Sam and Jeff have indicated a desire to make changes. I
> think Tom and Greg may also have indicated such a desire.
> The presumption of consensus evaporates.
>
> However, so far, we're not reaching rough consensus on any particular
> change.
>
> As chair, I need to ask: Would you prefer to block (possibly
> indefinitely) on this issue rather than publishing as-is?  For this, one
> word answers drawn from the set {yes, no} are preferred.  You can
> explain, but I do need to poll the WG about whether this is worth
> blocking the document.

I have a slight preference for blocking.

I'm still reviewing the discussion, but it seems that from what I've
read so far, the minimal change that I would be comfortable with (and
that we might reach consensus about) is removing the debated
attributes altogether.  We could easily add them back in a subsequent
version.  I dislike adding things that we know that people are very
likely not going implement in the way we specified.
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg