Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model

Leif Johansson <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:35:09 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.krb-wg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/28/2012 07:01 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Sam Hartman
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Nico" == Nico Williams <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> writes:
>> 
>> Nico> Block.  Or fix.  But do not publish as-is.  I'd be happy
>> with removal Nico> of the N-strikes-related attributes as a fix,
>> and any related text.
>> 
>> What attributes do you see as related to n-strikes? As an
>> individual I actually don't see any.
> 
> To be precise I want the following attributes to be made
> explicitly optional, or better: removed:
> 
> 4.1.1.5.  principalNumberOfFailedAuthenticationAttempts 4.1.1.6.
> principalLastFailedAuthentication 4.1.1.7.
> principalLastSuccessfulAuthentication
> 
> I'd be OK with adding a locked attribute.


I'm ok removing them or making them optional. I believe that
introducing locking will entail a substantial rewrite of the
spec which I think is not worth the effort at this point. Maybe
next revision!


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/so9gACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnezYwCggWCL9VkftEOsDNuotF/owAA1
aZsAnRy1D3Qh1Bc5iwUofnTjOruhrTeJ
=fM9h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg