Re: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and OIDs
Nico Williams <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:55:12 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK3OfOg6hX1tst3f4YMV8f9bXgpcHzV1v-AXhr7iZdKnijspGw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Sam Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: > Why do we have these OIDs registered here? > It seems like the OID should name a specific set of policy objects with > well defined semantics and encoding. > This draft doesn't get to that level of detail. > Wouldn't it be better to defer that to schema and/or implementation > documents? Agreed: this document doesn't specify LDAP schema, therefore it shouldn't allocate OIDs for LDAP schema. Other metaschemas might not require OIDs either, and anyways, it's really only LDAP that we need OIDs for in the Internet standards context. Nico -- _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg