Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:55:26 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tom Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >"Henry B. Hotz" <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Aug 21, 2012, at 1:33 PM, Jeffrey Altman wrote: >> >>> Your rule assumes that policy changes are enforced upon TGT renewals >and >>> my rule assumes that policy changes are enforced upon all ticket >>> renewals. I hope that policy changes are enforced during the >issuance >>> of all tickets and not just TGTs. >> >> Are there any currently deployed implementations which will directly >renew service tickets? I've always thought the concept of a renewable >non-tgt was counter to the design. > >RFC 1510 section 3.3.2 makes it clear that the KDC can renew a non-TGT >service ticket. Whether that's a good idea is debatable, but it does >appear to be part of the original design. Of course, a KDC my choose not to renew a ticket. But, issuing a renewable ticket which one has no intention of ever renewing is in poor taste. _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg