kerberos/kitten merger
Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Fri, 21 Sep 2012 19:36:41 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sasl,gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, I'm glad to see that both WGs are meeting in Atlanta and that you're doing the joint meeting thing again, which worked well last time. The chairs of both WGs and I have been discussing the rate of progress of work items in kitten and kerberos, which has been impacted to some extent by a lack of available chair cycles in recent times. That situation shows no sign of getting better for some of the chairs so we will be making some changes in order to address this. The main thing is that we're going to merge the two WGs. As of now the best suggestion seems to be to formally close krb-wg and re-charter kitten to cover both sets of work. Both lists will remain open of course if we take that route. (Note that renaming kitten is not a good plan, that'd muck up various tools in various ways.) As part of this, we'll re-charter to revisit the set of work items with the goal of reducing the list to a set of items that we can credibly plan to get finished in the near term. (For some reasonable definition of "near term.") In terms of chairing, Sam Hartman and Shawn Emery are the current co-chairs who are best placed to provide the required cycles for now and so Sam and Shawn will be chairing the merged entity. I'll put that in place as soon as we've decided on the logistics of the merger. But we're also looking out for someone new who's got knowledge and energy and hasn't chaired a WG before as a 3rd co-chair, so please let Sam, Shawn and I know if you're interested in that. I'd like to thank Alexey, Tom, Jeff and Larry for all their great work with both WGs and look forward to seeing them continue that work along with all the rest of us. Thanks also to Sam and Shawn for their continued willingness to help us all get more good work out the door. So, the follow-up is that Sam and Shawn (with help from Jeff) will start a discussion about re-chartering the WGs to arrive at a set of work items and then we can discuss whether that's best done with two continuing WGs or whatever on the list and in Atlanta. Regards, Stephen. PS: Please note that this isn't meant to be any criticism of anyone, whether participant, author or chair. In discussing with the chairs, we felt that we needed to make some changes, could do better, and figured this seems like the best way to try for that as of now. _______________________________________________ Kitten mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten