Re: I-DAction:draft-ietf-kitten-kerberos-iana-registries-00.txt
t.p. <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:39:46 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
p.s. Since this is in the Charter for krb-wg, I assume that the right place for discussion, unless and until the WGs are merger, is the krb-wg list and not the kitten one. I am subscribed to the former but not, at present, to the latter. Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "t.p." <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; "Tom Yu" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 2:51 PM > The IANA Considerations in this I-D looks rather thin for a document > that is setting up an IANA registry, while for the rest of the document, > I find myself overwhelmed by > detail, lacking an overview, a framework into which to put things. > > A registry usually has > - Name, unique within the IANA namespace > - Administratrive restrictions > - Technical restrictions > - Initial contents > and at least the first, I would expect to see under IANA Considerations, > with that same name appearing in the rest of the document. The rest of > information may then be in that section or else be pointed to from that > section. > > Here I see > "This document requests that IANA create several registries for > Kebreros protocol parameters. " > > Reading the rest of the document, with each registry being identified by > a prefix (in practice, one, two or more prefixes) it would seem that > some nine or so registries are being placed under IANA, with the initial > contents coming, in several cases, from section 7 of RFC4120. > > Um, sounds like a bottom-up design, a possible recipe for confusion. > > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Yu" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:22 AM > > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:52:22 -0700 > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > This draft is a work item of the Common Authentication Technology > Next Generation Working Group of the IETF. > > > > Title : Move Kerberos protocol parameter registries to IANA > > Author(s) : Tom Yu > > Filename : draft-ietf-kitten-kerberos-iana-registries-00.txt > > Pages : 6 > > Date : 2012-10-15 > > > > Abstract: > > The Keberos 5 network authentication protocol has several numeric > > protocol parameters. Most of these parameters are not currently > > under IANA maintenance. This document requests that IANA take over > > the maintenance of the remainder of these Kerberos parameters. > > > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-kitten-kerberos-iana-registr > ies > > > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-kitten-kerberos-iana-registries-00 > > > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > _______________________________________________ > ietf-krb-wg mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg > _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg