RE: IP Layer 2 Transport over L2TPv3

Sounds good to me.

Bill 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ignacio Goyret
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:24 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Wei Luo (luo)
> Subject: Re: [L2tpext] IP Layer 2 Transport over L2TPv3
> 
> Group,
> Personally, I think we should accept this draft as a WG item.
> Any objections? Comments?
> -Ignacio
> 
> 
> At 13:16 8/30/2005 -0400, Carlos Pignataro wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >We submitted the following `IP Layer 2 Transport over L2TPv3' draft:
> >http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i-d-announce/current/ms
g06623.htm
> >l that details the tunneling of IP datagrams directly over an L2TPv3 
> >session, and defines the `CE IP Address AVP' as well.
> >
> >We would like it to become an l2tpext working group 
> document, and seek 
> >review, feedback and comments from the WG.
> >So we ask here for the draft to be accepted as work item for 
> the group.
> >Your feedback will be most appreciated.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >--
> >--Carlos.
> >Escalation RTP - cisco Systems
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >L2tpext mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> L2tpext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext
>