Re: Q: is framing-capabilities value=0 legal

Ignacio Goyret <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.l2tpext
Message-ID <[email protected]>
AFAIK, 0 is a valid value for framing capabilities. Implicitly, it means
that the sender does not have the capabilities of sending an OCRQ to
its L2TP peer. Many LNSs do this because they are unable (by software
or configuration) of generating outgoing calls.


At 12:10 10/14/2005 -0700, Ricky Charlet wrote:
>
>Howdy,
>
>	I'm working on an l2tp+ppp product and have come around to
>interoperability testing. A vendor that I wish to interoperate with
>sends me (I'm the LNS) a framing-capabilities AVP value of 0 (neither A
>nor S). At first my code library was rejecting this as an illegal value
>and dropping the connection (sending stop).
>
>	But I did notice that if I ignore the framing-capabilities=0
>(none?) then my connection can proceed just fine.
>
>	So I need a bit of enlightenment.... is framing-capabilities=0 a
>legal value? The rfc makes no explicit statement about it that I can
>see. But my reading of the rfc's line "An LNS
>      MUST not send an OCRQ with a Framing Type AVP specifying a value
>      not advertised in this AVP."
> suggests that an LAC should set something, otherwise what would an LNS
>respond with?
>
>
>
>Thanks.
>
>---
>Ricky Charlet
>W: 408.754.1733
>[email protected]
>--- _
>   ( )  ASCII ribbon campaign 
>    X    - against HTML email
>   / \                  
>
>_______________________________________________
>L2tpext mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.