Re: HDLC frames delivered over PWs
Javi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.l2tpext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Prasad, > Hi Javi, > > I think x.25 type of control traffic is sensitive to sequence numbers > (Ns/NR). Ignacio mentioned this issue: "You still have the problem of delivering the I-frames to the remote LCCE reliably and in order. For that, this new fangled NSPs will need to implement some sort of reliable mechanism to deliver the I-frames and whatever other information may be needed (eg, XID contents, etc). This reliability and resequencing is not be provided by L2TP as is." > So selectively avoiding certain control pkts over pw may not > work. I guess the options are > > - Tune timeouts and re-tries as per the link delays. > Terminals have usually setup a value for the L2 timers. If you need "tweaking though" them, it would have to be done in all the terminals, which doesn't seem rasonable. And, generally, L2 timers negotiation (based on frames XID frames) is not implemented. So, "tune timeouts" is not a valid solution, I think. > - Terminate x.25 on PEs and use pw only for data traffic. > That is the option we have been suggested. This means only delivering Information (I) X.25 Frames, which would need would need an extension of RFC4349. Javier Muñoz