Re: Justification for HDLCPW and FRPW

Javi <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:39:43 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.l2tpext
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hello Carlos,

> Javi,
>
> Many relevant business consider protocols such as X.25, FR or 
> even ISDN are obsolete and dead.
>
> In that case, which is the justification for defining new RFCs such as 
> RFC 4349 and RFC4591 related to these old protocols?
>   
> Carlos Pignataro escribiÃ³:
> Because it's in L2tpext's Charter.
>   
I agree but it must have a practical justification, I think. Or is it 
only an theoretical analysis?. Which would be the useful purposes of 
these RFCs nowadays?

Thanks,

Javi