Re: draft-ietf-l2tpext-tdm-05
Alexander Vainshtein <[email protected]> Tue, 5 Aug 2008 07:43:50 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.l2tpext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C7680267C52F1@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com> |
Ignacio,
Lots of thanks, will do that.
Regards,
Sasha
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ignacio Goyret [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 8:46 PM
> To: Alexander Vainshtein
> Cc: Ignacio Goyret; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [L2tpext] draft-ietf-l2tpext-tdm-05
>
>
> >> * IANA Considerations:
> >> Just to make it clear to everyone involved, you may want
> to separate
> >> the lonely return code from the list of return/error
> codes and make
> >> two lists: a return code list (one item) and an error code
> >> list (with
> >> the 5 items).
> >
> >I would appreciate your advice regarding split of the IANA
> Considerations section.
>
> Sure. My thought was that instead of this:
>
> New return codes and error codes:
>
> 1. RC-TBD-1 - return code to indicate connection refused
> because of TDM PW parameters. The exact error code is as
> follows.
> 2. EC-TBD-1 - indicate Bit Rate values disagree.
> 3. EC-TBD-2 - indicate different trunk types in the case of
> trunk-specific CESoPSN with CAS
> 4. EC-TBD-3 - requested payload size too big or too small.
> 5. EC-TBD-4 - RTP header cannot be generated.
> 6. EC-TBD-5 - requested timestamp clock frequency cannot be
> generated
>
> The table could be split like this:
>
> New return codes for the CDN message:
>
> 1. RC-TBD-1 - Connection refused because of TDM PW parameters.
> The Error Code indicates the problem.
>
> New error codes, to be used with RC-TDB-1 return code:
>
> 1. EC-TBD-1 - Bit Rate values disagree (TDM PW AVP).
> 2. EC-TBD-2 - Different trunk types (for trunk-specific
> CESoPSN with CAS).
> 3. EC-TBD-3 - Requested payload size too big or too small.
> 4. EC-TBD-4 - RTP header cannot be generated.
> 5. EC-TBD-5 - Requested timestamp clock frequency cannot be
> generated.
>
> This format is more in line with IANA's registry.
>
> Makes sense?
> -Ignacio
>
>