Re: Control connection Tie breaker AVP : Need clarification
"Karthik Ravikanti" <[email protected]> Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:06:00 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.l2tpext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, Sorry for one more email, but here's my real doubt: What is the purpose of the Control Connection Tie Breaker AVP? 1) To ensure that only one tunnel exists? or 2) To ensure that only one tunnel is negotiated at the same time? (That is both the peers have outstanding SCCRQs) Thanks, Karthik On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Karthik Ravikanti <[email protected]> wrote: > RFC 3931 says: > > "The Control Connection Tie Breaker AVP, Attribute Type 5, > indicates that the sender desires a single control connection to > exist between a given pair of LCCEs." > > It further says: > > "The recipient of > a SCCRQ must check to see if a SCCRQ has been sent to the peer; if > so, a tie has been detected. In this case, the LCCE must compare > its Control Connection Tie Breaker value with the one received in > the SCCRQ. The lower value "wins", and the "loser" MUST discard > its control connection." > > So if the recipient loses, should he discard only the tunnels which he > originated and leave all the already established tunnels requested by > the winner intact? > > But then the inclusion of the Tie Breaker AVP would not have achieved > the purpose of ensuring only one tunnel exists. > > Am I missing something here? Please comment. > > > -- > Karthik Ravikanti > Associate Engineer, > Primesoft I.P. Solutions > Block III, White House, Begumpet > Hyderabad. > http://students.iiit.net/~karthik_ravikanti > ------------------------------- > Let There Be Sound! > -- Karthik Ravikanti Associate Engineer, Primesoft I.P. Solutions Block III, White House, Begumpet Hyderabad. http://students.iiit.net/~karthik_ravikanti ------------------------------- Let There Be Sound!