Re: An error in RFC 4446 "IANA Allocations for Pseudowire Edge to Edge Emulation (PWE3)"
Himanshu Shah <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:39:34 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pwe3,gmane.ietf.l2tpext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <34F81DE93A7AA840A6A3B1187BAD5FC80300C9661B@EXCH-CLUSTER-10.force10networks.com> |
There are a couple of drafts in L2VPN WG that uses this PW type (0x000B), such as http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-arp-mediation-12 So it is not an error or problem in the RFC 3032. It is meant to carry IP payload without any data link headers. Himanshu Force10 networks From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jiang Yuan-long Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 9:01 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: [PWE3] An error in RFC 4446 "IANA Allocations for Pseudowire Edge to Edge Emulation (PWE3)" Hi, all: I came accross an error in RFC 4446 "IANA Allocations for Pseudowire Edge to Edge Emulation (PWE3)". In Sec 3.2, it says: " 0x000B IP Layer2 Transport [RFC3032]" it should be: 0x000B IP Layer2 Transport [draft-ietf-l2tpext-pwe3-ip] The same problem also exists in web page version http://www.iana.org/assignments/pwe3-parameters. I wonder how about the status of this expired WG draft, will any more work continue on this document or just expired as it is? I also wonder whether we should define a PW type for IP payload so that everything on PW is possible. Any comments? Thanks, Yuanlong Jiang _______________________________________________ pwe3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3