Re: [L2tpext] L2TPEXT review of L2TPv3 extensions in draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-15

Carlos Pignataro wrote:
> L2tpext WG,
>
> I would like to ask for two or three volunteers to review the L2TPv3
> extensions defined in this document, mostly localized in Sections 8 and
> 14. Rev -15 just posted, but it does not appear to have L2TPv3 relevant
> changes. Please volunteer and reply to [email protected] if
> you are willing. Thanks in advance !
>
> Luca, PWE3,
>
> Many Thanks for asking !
>
> Please note that there was an early review by Matthew Bocci and myself
> that you requested of the I-D rev draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-10, at
> <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3/current/msg10236.html>. It
> appears that there are comments including in Section 8 (and in
> particular in Section 8.4.1 onwards) that seem to not have been
> addressed (as per list archive thread or diff with new I-D rev).
>
>   
Yes these should have been incorporated early on. I had received
comments from you , but somehow I missed this particular list.
Note that some of these problems are related to L2TPv3 specific
encapsulations, and are not specifically treated in the segmented-PW
document. Let me process the comments in an email, and we'll work to
find a solution.
Thanks!
Luca

> Thanks,
>
> -- Carlos.
>
> On 6/3/2010 6:14 PM, Luca Martini wrote:
>   
>> L2TPEXT WG,
>> he IESG as asked that you review the proposed L2TPv3 extensions 
>> documented in draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-14.
>>
>> These extensions are documented in section 8.
>>
>> Please advise us if you have any objections to the proposed additions.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Luca Martini
>> on behalf of pwe3 WG.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> L2tpext mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext
>>
>>