RFC 4591 and RFC 4349: DLCI at egress LCCE

Javi <[email protected]> Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:46:09 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.l2tpext
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

+ Frame Relay traffic transported in a "virtual circuit-to-virtual 
circuit" mode by L2TPv3 FRPW: Due to local significance of the DLCI, the 
egress LCCE re-writes the DLCI.

     RFC 4591 (L2TPv3 FRPW), clause 5
     The Frame Relay frame is transported in its entirety, including the 
DLCI ...  The egress LCCE re-writes the DLCI...

+ Frame Relay traffic transported in a "port" mode by L2TPv3 HDLCoPW 
(RFC 4349): It's not mentioned any DLCI modification at the egress LCCE. 
Why is it not necessary here (similarly, DLCI significance is local)?

Javi