Re: Pseudo-wires: uni-directional o bi-directional?
Javi <[email protected]> Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:51:23 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.l2tpext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ignacio, Ok. I agree, L2TPv3 Session is bidirectional. >> A Session ID is a possible PW label. So, a L2TPv3 session is really a >> L2TPv3 PW. > > You are confusing terms and concepts. > Don't confuse labels with sessions with traffic within a session. > They are all very different concepts. I don't understand. I think a L2TPv3 PW is a pseudo-wire which "PW Label" is a "L2TPv3 Session ID". Why not? Then, why is a L2TPv3 session not a "L2TPv3 PW"?, which would be the difference? And, finally, is a PW bidirectional, like a L2TPv3 Session? Javi