Re: L2TPEXT review of L2TPv3 extensions in draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-15

Neil McGill wrote:
> Acked, but it would be good to have at least a note that the LDP PW status 
> TLV should be mapped to the L2TPv3 Extended Circuit Status Values TLV at 
> switching points.  The mappings themselves are obvious enough.
>
>   
Yes - I updated the document.
Thanks.
Luca

> The v3 TLV is specified in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5641
>
> Thanks,
>
> Neil.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Carlos Pignataro wrote:
>
>   
>> We received three responses volunteering to review the document for
>> L2TPext: Prashant Jhingran, Sam Aldrin, and Neil McGill in Cc.
>>
>> The current version is at
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-15>. Please
>> send your comments and Acks/Nacks to [email protected], Cc to [email protected].
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -- Carlos, on behalf of L2TPext.
>>
>> On 6/3/2010 6:14 PM, Luca Martini wrote:
>>     
>>> L2TPEXT WG,
>>> he IESG as asked that you review the proposed L2TPv3 extensions 
>>> documented in draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-14.
>>>
>>> These extensions are documented in section 8.
>>>
>>> Please advise us if you have any objections to the proposed additions.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> Luca Martini
>>> on behalf of pwe3 WG.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pwe3 mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>>>
>>>       
>
>

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3