Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3931 (3766)

On Oct 28, 2013, at 3:38 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote:

> This seems to be an accurate, yet harmless, editorial nit. I would Verify it as such.

Yes, I wonder how that got in there." Thanks!

- Mark

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- Carlos.
> 
> On Oct 26, 2013, at 8:37 PM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3931,
>> "Layer Two Tunneling Protocol - Version 3 (L2TPv3)".
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3931&eid=3766
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Chaz Granholm <[email protected]>
>> 
>> Section: 8.2.3
>> 
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> Further, it is far easier to change a compromised L2TPv3
>> 
>>  Cookie than a compromised IP address," and a cryptographically random
>> 
>>  [RFC1750] value is far less likely to be discovered by brute-force
>> 
>>  attacks compared to an IP address.
>> 
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> Further, it is far easier to change a compromised L2TPv3
>> 
>>  Cookie than a compromised IP address, and a cryptographically random
>> 
>>  [RFC1750] value is far less likely to be discovered by brute-force
>> 
>>  attacks compared to an IP address.
>> 
>> Notes
>> -----
>> Erroneous quotation mark.
>> 
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC3931 (draft-ietf-l2tpext-l2tp-base-15)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Layer Two Tunneling Protocol - Version 3 (L2TPv3)
>> Publication Date    : March 2005
>> Author(s)           : J. Lau, Ed., M. Townsley, Ed., I. Goyret, Ed.
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions
>> Area                : Internet
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>