Re: WG Adoption of Keyed IPv6 Tunnel [draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel]

On 04/03/14 06:01, Henderickx, Wim (Wim) wrote:
> Support as co-author

Support as implementer.

We have 3 interworking implementations which use this (and can be 
configured to use other forms of L2TPv3) as virtual network overlay - 
both datacenter and datacenter extension to customer premises.

The spec allows high performance implementation in software and 
userspace on POSIX compliant systems, can be pushed to multi-Gbit VM to 
VM and VM to physical device performance.

We are releasing the kvm implementation and the UML implementation as 
open source. The third one is proprietary and there is no intention to 
open source it at this point. All will ship in product.

A.

>
> On 03/03/14 20:33, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> WG,
>>
>> The authors of 'Keyed IPv6 Tunnel' have requested that L2TPEXT adopts
>> this draft as a WG document. The draft received discussion and comments
>> on the list, and was updated twice based on list feedback.
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-00
>>
>> This message starts a three-week Call for WG Adoption for
>> draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-00. Given that IETF89 is going
>> on right now, we are adding an extra week to this adoption call. The call
>> for adoption will end on Monday, March 24th.
>>
>> Please share your thoughts on this adoption call on the list -- we will
>> not be taking silence as support. Bonus points supporting a yes/no email
>> with a technical explanation as to why.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Carlos.
> _______________________________________________
> L2tpext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext