Re: WG Adoption of Keyed IPv6 Tunnel [draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel]

<[email protected]> Tue, 4 Mar 2014 17:46:21 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.l2tpext
Message-ID <0F3AD32C1A0F73449C9B6D8E53E863BDA8FCC4CAFD@HE113421.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Me too!

Rainer Schatzmayr
Tel: +49 160 5361818

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Giles Heron [mailto:[email protected]] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. März 2014 11:40
An: Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
Cc: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata); [email protected]; [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [L2tpext] WG Adoption of Keyed IPv6 Tunnel [draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel]

Likewise.

On 4 Mar 2014, at 06:01, "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Support as co-author
> 
> On 03/03/14 20:33, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> WG,
>> 
>> The authors of 'Keyed IPv6 Tunnel' have requested that L2TPEXT adopts 
>> this draft as a WG document. The draft received discussion and 
>> comments on the list, and was updated twice based on list feedback.
>> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-0
>> 0
>> 
>> This message starts a three-week Call for WG Adoption for 
>> draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-00. Given that IETF89 is 
>> going on right now, we are adding an extra week to this adoption 
>> call. The call for adoption will end on Monday, March 24th.
>> 
>> Please share your thoughts on this adoption call on the list -- we 
>> will not be taking silence as support. Bonus points supporting a 
>> yes/no email with a technical explanation as to why.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Carlos.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> L2tpext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext