Re: 6MAN cross-wg review: draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-01

Ole Troan <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:59:28 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.l2tpext,gmane.ietf.ipv6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks Karsten, I look forward to your review.

Best regards,
Ole

> On 12 Jan 2015, at 12:52 , Karsten Thomann <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> As Jinmai already wrote, I can volunteer, but only under the same constrains, as I have no prior experience with reviews.
>  
> Some comments:
> I know it is also written in RFC4719, but why was "or" used at "Ethernet frame, without the preamble or frame check sequence (FCS)".
> At the payload section is "and" used...
> "As noted above preamble and FCS are stripped before encapsulation."
>  
> As already written by Jinmai, the hop limit is with 255 as a default setting a bit high, a default of 64 should be high enough for nearly all cases.
>  
> Kind regards
> Karsten
>  
> Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 12:14:14 schrieb Ole Troan:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The chairs of l2tpext have asked for a 6man review of:
> > 
> > Title: Keyed IPv6 Tunnel
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-01
> > 
> > Can we get a couple of volunteers please? As well as any other comments to
> > the lists are welcome of course. Please keep [email protected] in CC.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Ole
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------