Re: 6MAN cross-wg review: draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-01
Ole Troan <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:59:28 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.l2tpext,gmane.ietf.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks Karsten, I look forward to your review. Best regards, Ole > On 12 Jan 2015, at 12:52 , Karsten Thomann <[email protected]> wrote: > > As Jinmai already wrote, I can volunteer, but only under the same constrains, as I have no prior experience with reviews. > > Some comments: > I know it is also written in RFC4719, but why was "or" used at "Ethernet frame, without the preamble or frame check sequence (FCS)". > At the payload section is "and" used... > "As noted above preamble and FCS are stripped before encapsulation." > > As already written by Jinmai, the hop limit is with 255 as a default setting a bit high, a default of 64 should be high enough for nearly all cases. > > Kind regards > Karsten > > Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 12:14:14 schrieb Ole Troan: > > Hi, > > > > The chairs of l2tpext have asked for a 6man review of: > > > > Title: Keyed IPv6 Tunnel > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-01 > > > > Can we get a couple of volunteers please? As well as any other comments to > > the lists are welcome of course. Please keep [email protected] in CC. > > > > Best regards, > > Ole > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > [email protected] > > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------