Re: Spanglish
Michael Everson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7 Jan 2017, at 16:34, Kent Karlsson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don’t believe that your undefined “hybrid locales” have anything to do with the linguistic realities of contact-language. But until you describe it real linguistic terms, it’s not got anything to do with Spanglish. > > Looking at the current Filipino CLDR locale data, it is actually a "fil+en+es" mix. But that’s not contact-language… Filipino and Tagalog simply make use of very large numbers of loanwords. English does too. But we would not say that English is ang+fr+la Michael _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages