Re: ISO 639-3 language codes posted

David Starner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Message-ID <CAMZ=zj4jJESxfjQAmPX1-C_z7iJMsP1KO=evW168dG=pFJof=A@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:43 PM Melinda lyons <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear IETF list members,
>
> The changes to ISO 639-3 for 2016 have now been posted. Changes can be
> viewed at:
> http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/chg_requests.asp?order=CR_Number&chg_status=2016
> and the new download files are available at:
> http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/download.asp.
>
> For any questions or comments about these changes, please contact the
> Registration Authority at [email protected].
>

Looking at a couple of the rejected slips, Pomeranian can probably be coded
as nds-BR. Louisiana Spanish would need a separate tag; I don't think even
subnational territory codes would be appropriate here, given that the
dialects of Spanish spoken most commonly in Louisiana are probably more
related to es-MX (and es-CU, maybe?) than to these native dialects. I'm not
even sure they should be one tag, given the change request says "Autonym
(self-name) for this language:
Two separate, unrelated varieties: (1) Adaeseño/Adaesano (2) Isleño".

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.