Re: ISO 639-3 language codes posted
David Starner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMZ=zj4jJESxfjQAmPX1-C_z7iJMsP1KO=evW168dG=pFJof=A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:43 PM Melinda lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear IETF list members, > > The changes to ISO 639-3 for 2016 have now been posted. Changes can be > viewed at: > http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/chg_requests.asp?order=CR_Number&chg_status=2016 > and the new download files are available at: > http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/download.asp. > > For any questions or comments about these changes, please contact the > Registration Authority at [email protected]. > Looking at a couple of the rejected slips, Pomeranian can probably be coded as nds-BR. Louisiana Spanish would need a separate tag; I don't think even subnational territory codes would be appropriate here, given that the dialects of Spanish spoken most commonly in Louisiana are probably more related to es-MX (and es-CU, maybe?) than to these native dialects. I'm not even sure they should be one tag, given the change request says "Autonym (self-name) for this language: Two separate, unrelated varieties: (1) Adaeseño/Adaesano (2) Isleño". _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages