Re: Spanglish

Michael Everson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8 Feb 2017, at 20:29, Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Reminder: We still need a decision on 'spanglis’. 

I approve it. 

Whatever scenario for language mixing has been proposed to the CLDR is not, I think, descriptive of contact dialects used for literary purposes, as has been demonstrated adequately for Spanglish. I don’t know what kind of “locale mixing” has been proposed for them to want their solution. Maybe it’s something as unremarkable as “Khakas language user who uses Russian-language software”. Who knows? 

Anyway, “spanglis” is good to go.

Michael Everson
_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.