Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux

John Cowan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Message-ID <CAD2gp_Ti-N2T3WeES_x3H5+mrnPJ0ONySSDcBOG_YJcP-+L3dQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Michael Everson <[email protected]>
wrote:

No; Germans will very likely say [tsitʀo] and not [ˈsɪtɹoʊ]. That’s not
> just “accent”.
>

The difference between [ˈwɔːtə] and [ˈwɒɾɚ] is just accent, despite having
only one phone in common.

Splendid, but this does not answer the question. There are surely different
> pronunciations common for these, differing from country to country and
> language to language. What prefix or prefixes would you intend this subtag
> to be used with?
>

Surely "Prefix: la" is correct, which allows any nationality tag.  In
practice, a nationality tag with "la" of any sort will be used only to tag
speech recordings:  one may *speak* Latin according to the German
pronunciation, but one does not *write* Latin according to the German
pronunciation, one simply writes Latin.  The same is true of every
classical language.

-- 
My .sigs are from my large and miscellaneous reading both on and off the
net.
Occasionally I hear one viva voce or make one up (without attribution,
of course).  I try to stay within the McQuary limit, but sometimes fail,
as in this case.  In general, the quotes are chosen at random by a script
from <http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan/signatures>, but sometimes I choose one
on purpose.  I've been collecting and using them for 30+ years.

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.