Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux
John Cowan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD2gp_Ti-N2T3WeES_x3H5+mrnPJ0ONySSDcBOG_YJcP-+L3dQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Michael Everson <[email protected]> wrote: No; Germans will very likely say [tsitʀo] and not [ˈsɪtɹoʊ]. That’s not > just “accent”. > The difference between [ˈwɔːtə] and [ˈwɒɾɚ] is just accent, despite having only one phone in common. Splendid, but this does not answer the question. There are surely different > pronunciations common for these, differing from country to country and > language to language. What prefix or prefixes would you intend this subtag > to be used with? > Surely "Prefix: la" is correct, which allows any nationality tag. In practice, a nationality tag with "la" of any sort will be used only to tag speech recordings: one may *speak* Latin according to the German pronunciation, but one does not *write* Latin according to the German pronunciation, one simply writes Latin. The same is true of every classical language. -- My .sigs are from my large and miscellaneous reading both on and off the net. Occasionally I hear one viva voce or make one up (without attribution, of course). I try to stay within the McQuary limit, but sometimes fail, as in this case. In general, the quotes are chosen at random by a script from <http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan/signatures>, but sometimes I choose one on purpose. I've been collecting and using them for 30+ years. _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages