Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux
Arthur Reutenauer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> This page does not argue that binomial names should be pronounced the >> same way in every language > > "Latin biological names in English speech are usually pronounced with > English letter sounds. [...] An Anglo-Latin pronunciation has been in > use for centuries... " I don’t understand why you quote that when it disproves your point so effectively. The first sentence states precisely that it is about the pronunciation of binomial names in English, and says nothing of other languages. > The references it cites include: > > Chandler, C. > 1889 > Pronunciation of Latin and Quasi-latin Scientific terms. > Bulletin of the Scientific Laboratories of Denison University 4:161-176. That article is even more insistent that the pronunciation it describes applies to English only, to an almost nauseating point (I stopped reading after a few pages). The paragraph that takes most of the second page is clearest about that. I quote it in full, because it is both informative and entertaining: As for the so-called Continental (i. e. German) way of pronouncing Latin, which about 1860–’75 was epidemic in many parts of this country, especially in the West, I judge that there is not one word which may be justly said in favor of its use by an English speaking student. Like the English method, it is not and does not pretend to be the ancient way ; it is to the German exactly what the English method is to the English- speaker, a conventional manner of pronouncing Latin words, so nearly as may be, according to the analogies of his own tongue. It is used, I believe, in all German schools. To the German it has very much to commend it,—to the American or Englishman, nothing whatever. That so many American colleges and schools should hastily abandon a method of pronouncing Latin which was indeed not the ancient way, but was at least natural to the learner and helped him to understand and to pronounce correctly thousands of English words, and that they should adopt in its place a method which also made no pretence of being the ancient way, and which had the very great disadvantage of being utterly unnatural to the student and of tempting him to mispronounce thousands of English words,—that this should be done, the true ancient pronunciation being all the while approximately known, seems to me to have been one of the strangest of all the vagaries of American pedagogy. It was perhaps the most curious phase of that undiscriminating Germanomania which has so often snatched at the form while entirely missing the spirit of German scholarship. The American student was naively supposed to be taking a long step toward German patience and thoroughness, when he learned to mispronounce Latin according to the German method. This seems like a nice illustration of what several members of this list have been trying to tell you, that tagging binomial names separately will in many cases not help screen readers, quite the contrary. Best, Arthur _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages