Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux

Michael Everson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I agree with what Arthur has said here. 

> On 24 Feb 2017, at 09:59, Arthur Reutenauer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 	Andy,
> 
>  I think it would be useful if, instead of replying to Michael
> tit-for-tat, you would list actual use cases where a subtag would help.
> Wikipedia is one of them, and your position, if I’ve understood it
> correctly, is: the subtag can be rolled out instantly in infoboxes by
> changing the template, and it would be up to Wikipedia contributors to
> use it in running text, according to Wikimedia guidelines and
> long-standing practice.  That’s one example, and nobody denies that it
> is a legitimate one.
> 
>  We need more.  You’ve referred several times to earlier discussions,
> some of which contain concrete suggestions, but if you want to convince
> the contributors to this list you’ll need to actually write them down
> instead of just giving pointers.  This is not a peer-reviewed article,
> nobody is going to check your references, and besides your emails don’t
> come with a bibliography at the bottom.  In any case, if all you write
> is “see the points made by ...” said points are not actually part of the
> discussion.
> 
>  It would also be useful if you acknowledged that the system for which
> you wish to have a subtag is not in any way a language, variety, or
> dialect.  It has no syntax, no parts of speech except for nouns and
> adjectives, no autonomous pronunciation.  It is a specialised lexicon
> which, as Karl pointed out, is sufficiently “language-like” to warrant
> separate tagging.  Binomial names currently appear in contexts where (as
> I understand it) language tagging would be appropriate because other,
> similar pieces of content are marked with their own tag.  The previous
> sentence is intentionally vague because I don’t actually know what these
> situations are; this is precisely what you should illustrate with
> concrete examples.  People on this list are receptive to these
> arguments.
> 
> 	Best,
> 
> 		Arthur
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.