Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux
Michael Everson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree with what Arthur has said here. > On 24 Feb 2017, at 09:59, Arthur Reutenauer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Andy, > > I think it would be useful if, instead of replying to Michael > tit-for-tat, you would list actual use cases where a subtag would help. > Wikipedia is one of them, and your position, if I’ve understood it > correctly, is: the subtag can be rolled out instantly in infoboxes by > changing the template, and it would be up to Wikipedia contributors to > use it in running text, according to Wikimedia guidelines and > long-standing practice. That’s one example, and nobody denies that it > is a legitimate one. > > We need more. You’ve referred several times to earlier discussions, > some of which contain concrete suggestions, but if you want to convince > the contributors to this list you’ll need to actually write them down > instead of just giving pointers. This is not a peer-reviewed article, > nobody is going to check your references, and besides your emails don’t > come with a bibliography at the bottom. In any case, if all you write > is “see the points made by ...” said points are not actually part of the > discussion. > > It would also be useful if you acknowledged that the system for which > you wish to have a subtag is not in any way a language, variety, or > dialect. It has no syntax, no parts of speech except for nouns and > adjectives, no autonomous pronunciation. It is a specialised lexicon > which, as Karl pointed out, is sufficiently “language-like” to warrant > separate tagging. Binomial names currently appear in contexts where (as > I understand it) language tagging would be appropriate because other, > similar pieces of content are marked with their own tag. The previous > sentence is intentionally vague because I don’t actually know what these > situations are; this is precisely what you should illustrate with > concrete examples. People on this list are receptive to these > arguments. > > Best, > > Arthur > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-languages mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages