Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux
John Cowan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD2gp_T644G8jZQvgsRawBqYXi7n00qcbETQkCQ_a-EOVrgnMQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Luc Pardon <[email protected]> wrote: For example, there is more than one pronunciation for English, but we > tag them all with "en". That is because we're tagging texts, i.e. the > written form of the language. Where the writing differs (and matters), > the tag can be made more specific (en-US vs. en-UK, or en-UK-oxendict), > until it is precise enough for a spell checker to do its job - i.e. > checking the written form. > We also do tag spoken-word artifacts like movies, and there are suitable subtags for that. If, on the other hand, it should turn out that these words are > pronounced in the same way by taxonomists all over the world That is certainly not the case. > For example, in "Camellia sinensis", the sound of the first -i- in > "sinensis" may vary, but I'd expect the stress to be on the -e- in any > language. > Well, in languages that have phonemic stress. In French I'd expect the words to be pronounced as in French, with only utterance-final stress. > In other words: the tagger can make do with a world-wide "la-taxon" tag > to "push" the TTS engine in the right direction, and the user of the TTS > can "pull" it towards him. This is the same as with regional accents, > where the text writer (or tagger) and the listener also have to > "cooperate" in telling the TTS what to do. > Thank you for explaining clearly what I have been striving to express. > Secondly, you also suggest that "la-taxon" may be too vague: > > > if other taxonomies need to be supported > > That, I'd say, has more to do with the _meaning_ of the taxonomic name > than with accessibility. > As far as I know, only the Linnaean system is Latin-based. Other taxonomies either use a single vernacular language or multiple equally authentic languages. The intent here is to tag Linnaean names, not just any taxonomical names. There would be a need to be more precise - although not for _web_ > accessibility purposes - if a single name would have different meanings > in different taxonomies, The same name may be and is applied to different taxa for animals and plants, as a consequence of having different registration authorities. However, this is generally not a problem and disambiguation is left to context: when a botanist speaks of Proboscidea, devil's-claws are meant, not elephants. -- No saves, Antonio, loke es morirse en su lingua. Es komo kedarse soliko en el silensyo kada dya ke Dyo da, komoser sikileoso sin saver porke. --Marcel Cohen, 1985 _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages