Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux

Kent Karlsson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Message-ID <D4DE35CB.3B7CE%[email protected]>
Den 2017-03-01 18:00, skrev "Luc Pardon" <[email protected]>:

>    As a matter of fact, "homo sapiens" is also in the Dutch "red book"
(the
> official 2005 spelling wordlist). It even lists the plural
("homines
> sapientes"). Same for "homo erectus" (homines erecti) and
"homo ludens"
> (homines ludentes).


Hmm. Since these are /names/ of /entire species/ (not individuals), I
don't think it is appropriate to pluralise these names in any language.

So, "We found remains of three [individuals of [the species]]
/Homo erectus/", NOT "We found remains of three /homines erecti/".
(Brackets mean that the part may be omitted, and taken as understood.)

(This nit is of course not relevant for accepting a subtag for such names.)

/Kent K


_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.