Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux
Kent Karlsson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D4DE35CB.3B7CE%[email protected]> |
Den 2017-03-01 18:00, skrev "Luc Pardon" <[email protected]>: > As a matter of fact, "homo sapiens" is also in the Dutch "red book" (the > official 2005 spelling wordlist). It even lists the plural ("homines > sapientes"). Same for "homo erectus" (homines erecti) and "homo ludens" > (homines ludentes). Hmm. Since these are /names/ of /entire species/ (not individuals), I don't think it is appropriate to pluralise these names in any language. So, "We found remains of three [individuals of [the species]] /Homo erectus/", NOT "We found remains of three /homines erecti/". (Brackets mean that the part may be omitted, and taken as understood.) (This nit is of course not relevant for accepting a subtag for such names.) /Kent K _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages