Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux

Kent Karlsson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Message-ID <D4DE5116.3B7E1%[email protected]>
Den 2017-03-02 20:45, skrev "Yury Tarasievich" <[email protected]>:

> Linnaeus' system was binomial, but don't we have 
tri- and quadri-nomial (?)
> taxon names these days?


I think the tag ('la-linnaei', or whatever Michael settles on) should be
applicable to all species *and* species group names, at various levels.
Like "Eukaryota", "Plantae", "Orthomyxoviridae" (yes, a group of viruses),
"Cantharellales", etc. Not just the bi/tri/...-nomial names (like
"Saccharomyces cerevisiae" or "Fusarium graminearum deltaflexivirus 1").

Some such names are translated (e.g. "Basidiomycota"->"Basidiesvampar",
but the scientific names are still Latin(ish). The translations should
not be tagged 'la-linnaei'.

I guess this kind of naming would apply to names of entirely artificially
created species as well (yes, such are being created;
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/may/20/craig-venter-synthetic-life-
form, though this one seems to be a variety of a pre-exiting species, not an
entirely new one). Would probably also apply to exo-species (if we ever
find any) that we (as in humankind) get to name...

/Kent K


_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.