Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux
Kent Karlsson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D4DE5116.3B7E1%[email protected]> |
Den 2017-03-02 20:45, skrev "Yury Tarasievich" <[email protected]>: > Linnaeus' system was binomial, but don't we have tri- and quadri-nomial (?) > taxon names these days? I think the tag ('la-linnaei', or whatever Michael settles on) should be applicable to all species *and* species group names, at various levels. Like "Eukaryota", "Plantae", "Orthomyxoviridae" (yes, a group of viruses), "Cantharellales", etc. Not just the bi/tri/...-nomial names (like "Saccharomyces cerevisiae" or "Fusarium graminearum deltaflexivirus 1"). Some such names are translated (e.g. "Basidiomycota"->"Basidiesvampar", but the scientific names are still Latin(ish). The translations should not be tagged 'la-linnaei'. I guess this kind of naming would apply to names of entirely artificially created species as well (yes, such are being created; https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/may/20/craig-venter-synthetic-life- form, though this one seems to be a variety of a pre-exiting species, not an entirely new one). Would probably also apply to exo-species (if we ever find any) that we (as in humankind) get to name... /Kent K _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages