Re: Language for taxonomic names, redux
John Cowan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD2gp_SiNrY4upusD3J4mmnSDf-5uXYVBX5wrsJi9yVjJjNF3Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Kent Karlsson <[email protected]> wrote: I think the tag ('la-linnaei', or whatever Michael settles on) should be > applicable to all species *and* species group names, at various levels. > Like "Eukaryota", "Plantae", "Orthomyxoviridae" (yes, a group of viruses), > "Cantharellales", etc. Not just the bi/tri/...-nomial names (like > "Saccharomyces cerevisiae" or "Fusarium graminearum deltaflexivirus 1"). > I agree. -- John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan [email protected] Let's face it: software is crap. Feature-laden and bloated, written under tremendous time-pressure, often by incapable coders, using dangerous languages and inadequate tools, trying to connect to heaps of broken or obsolete protocols, implemented equally insufficiently, running on unpredictable hardware -- we are all more than used to brokenness. --Felix Winkelmann _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages