Re: Registration requests: akuapem, asante
"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20170522085857.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.ed3d9e561a.wbe@email03.godaddy.com> |
On May 18 I wrote: > Is it already the case that Twi is tagged inconsistently as either > 'tw' or 'ak'? Hearing no response, I offer this suggestion: The purpose of BCP 47 is to provide identifiers for language content, based when possible on ISO standard code elements. ISO 639 has coded Twi [tw, twi] separately from Akan [ak, aka]. Irrespective of the fact that "Twi" is actually a name for two of the three major dialects of Akan (the two for which Sascha has proposed variant subtags), I believe it would be destabilizing for BCP 47 to encourage users to tag Twi content as "ak" or "ak-anything" instead of using "tw". Therefore, I suggest (to the Reviewer in particular) that Sascha's proposals be approved as is, without adding "Prefix: ak" to either. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org