Re: Registration requests: akuapem, asante

Michael Everson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Um, well, three example documents on the Unicode website is not the strongest user case I’ve seen.

Michael Everson

> On 29 May 2017, at 10:53, Sascha Brawer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > So, I've tended to say: don't ask for a variant until you need it. 
> There’s a concrete need, namely to assign different BCP47 language tags to these three documents:
> http://www.unicode.org/udhr/d/udhr_aka_akuapem.xml
> http://www.unicode.org/udhr/d/udhr_aka_asante.xml
> http://www.unicode.org/udhr/d/udhr_aka_fante.xml
> 
> Currently, all three are tagged as xml:lang="ak". Based on this discussion, it sounds like they can be tagged as xml:lang="tw-akuapem", xml:lang="tw-asante" and xml:lang="fat" once the proposed new variant subtags (for akuapem and asante) have been registered.
> 
> — Sascha


_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.