Re: Registration requests: akuapem, asante

Sascha Brawer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Message-ID <CAJv0UNW_GBWWv93CFQprMvidwj-K9mrGwkx=RdA9fEpkgGxw+Q@mail.gmail.com>
> So, I've tended to say: don't ask for a variant until you need it.
There’s a concrete need, namely to assign different BCP47 language tags to
these three documents:
http://www.unicode.org/udhr/d/udhr_aka_akuapem.xml
http://www.unicode.org/udhr/d/udhr_aka_asante.xml
http://www.unicode.org/udhr/d/udhr_aka_fante.xml

Currently, all three are tagged as xml:lang="ak". Based on this discussion,
it sounds like they can be tagged as xml:lang="tw-akuapem",
xml:lang="tw-asante" and xml:lang="fat" once the proposed new variant
subtags (for akuapem and asante) have been registered.

— Sascha



On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Martin Hosken <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Dear Doug,
>
> > > There is a unified orthography for Akan. What does that mean when,
> > > say, Twi Asante, Twi Akuapem, and Fante (which from all descriptions
> > > are mutually intelligible) are written in it? One might refer simply
> > > to writing Akan (ak)? Or would new subtags for the unified orthography
> > > in question reference it under tw or fat?
> >
> > Well, again, it really comes down to current practice. If there is no
> > current practice to speak of -- if Twi and Fanti and unified-orthography
> > Akan aren't being tagged at present, or if tagging is all over the
> > place -- then we are in a position to encourage a best practice. A
> > reasonable solution might be:
>
> I think your solution is a good one. But it does raise the question of
> whether this is the right time to add this subtag. I have a list of 3000+
> dialects from one registry. We could try to add variants for them all
> speculatively, but that would be a lot of work much of which we would get
> wrong. So, I've tended to say: don't ask for a variant until you need it.
> Is this a right approach or not?
>
> > Yes, this is always something to strive for when proposing a subtag,
> > especially variant subtags for a living language with 9 million speakers
> > (WP).
>
> This does make it riper for resolving in this case.
>
> Yours,
> Martin
>

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.