Re: Registration requests: akuapem, asante
Sascha Brawer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJv0UNW_GBWWv93CFQprMvidwj-K9mrGwkx=RdA9fEpkgGxw+Q@mail.gmail.com> |
> So, I've tended to say: don't ask for a variant until you need it. There’s a concrete need, namely to assign different BCP47 language tags to these three documents: http://www.unicode.org/udhr/d/udhr_aka_akuapem.xml http://www.unicode.org/udhr/d/udhr_aka_asante.xml http://www.unicode.org/udhr/d/udhr_aka_fante.xml Currently, all three are tagged as xml:lang="ak". Based on this discussion, it sounds like they can be tagged as xml:lang="tw-akuapem", xml:lang="tw-asante" and xml:lang="fat" once the proposed new variant subtags (for akuapem and asante) have been registered. — Sascha On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Martin Hosken <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Doug, > > > > There is a unified orthography for Akan. What does that mean when, > > > say, Twi Asante, Twi Akuapem, and Fante (which from all descriptions > > > are mutually intelligible) are written in it? One might refer simply > > > to writing Akan (ak)? Or would new subtags for the unified orthography > > > in question reference it under tw or fat? > > > > Well, again, it really comes down to current practice. If there is no > > current practice to speak of -- if Twi and Fanti and unified-orthography > > Akan aren't being tagged at present, or if tagging is all over the > > place -- then we are in a position to encourage a best practice. A > > reasonable solution might be: > > I think your solution is a good one. But it does raise the question of > whether this is the right time to add this subtag. I have a list of 3000+ > dialects from one registry. We could try to add variants for them all > speculatively, but that would be a lot of work much of which we would get > wrong. So, I've tended to say: don't ask for a variant until you need it. > Is this a right approach or not? > > > Yes, this is always something to strive for when proposing a subtag, > > especially variant subtags for a living language with 9 million speakers > > (WP). > > This does make it riper for resolving in this case. > > Yours, > Martin > _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages