Re: Forms for July 2017 changes to ISO 15924
Peter Constable <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DM2PR21MB00289E95485168C21CA2ACD6D5B60@DM2PR21MB0028.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> |
I was not asking for removal. I only ask that, if we include a phonemic transcription, that it reflect speech of the primary user community, and not some other language of wider communication. Based on Michael's reply, I'm satisfied that, in this case, this reflects the primary community. Peter -----Original Message----- From: Ietf-languages [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Doug Ewell Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 7:50 AM To: ietf-languages <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Forms for July 2017 changes to ISO 15924 I can't tell whether folks are asking to remove "na²¹ɕi³³ to³³ba²¹" and "na²¹ɕi³³ gʌ²¹ba²¹" from the proposals, or if they're just remarking. For anyone who is asking to remove them, do you also want to remove the existing "'Na-'Khi ²Ggŏ-¹baw"? -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fietf-languages&data=02%7C01%7Cpetercon%40microsoft.com%7C0187a6c8fa394a8f8bda08d4db482d9f%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636374550433190176&sdata=B9eEF9xD9qew5UiIEL%2BPgZ8eazQd8QoM%2F2t1vgceYVk%3D&reserved=0 _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages