Re: Montenegrin
Arthur Reutenauer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I can understand that... I do believe the end result of giving their > dialect a language code will be counterproductive, since there is already a > code for expressing what they have: sr-ME. And such action further muddies > the line for what constitutes a language: one step further along a slippery > slope to an "American" language code, or a "Texan" language code, etc. If the latter is ever requested, we may consider extending the set of region subtags to include ISO 3166-2 ;-) > But one does get tired of pointing out when someone is going to shoot > themselves in the foot. As with Brexit, people don't always consider all > the ramifications of what seems simple and attractive on the surface. (Dont’t get me started.) Best, Arthur _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages