Re: Montenegrin
David Starner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMZ=zj7Kagpdi2FTwOe1QqAE-V7ui77adhTzNrOza5PKrU=vAQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:32 AM Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote: > Is that a working model of the JAC, that once an error is made in > disunifying language codes, the floodgates are open? I would hope not. > It's not a question of "bias against." > On the flip side, if Montengrin is encoded, it still doesn't mean the floodgates are open. Montengrin has the nationalist aspects of a language down; even if it set a precedent, there aren't that many languages that could claim to follow it. And if the US decided it spoke American, I doubt the opposition to it would prevent the addition of a code for it for long. _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages