Re: Montenegrin has been given an ISO 639-3 code
John Cowan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD2gp_Q=fEa0Do02xfZstWGzPqirW7xHsRRydHck8MD+Ji89wQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Peter Constable <[email protected]> wrote: > This is not coming into 639-3 by typical 639-3 process, but rather via > 639-2 process. > I was going to ask if the new code would be added to the "hbs" (aka "sh") macrolanguage, but I see that macrolanguage is no longer on the 639-2 page, though it is still in the 639-3 system. Does that mean that 639-2 has removed it? -- John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan [email protected] No, John. I want formats that are actually useful, rather than over- featured megaliths that address all questions by piling on ridiculous internal links in forms which are hideously over-complex. --Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages