Re: Montenegrin has been given an ISO 639-3 code
Peter Constable <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CY4PR21MB0822989958432E8FE5DFE934D52E0@CY4PR21MB0822.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> |
639-2 never included “hbs” or any equivalent to “sh”. I created “hbs” in the draft code table of ISO DIS 639-3 so that part 3 would not have the anomaly of not including an entry for something defined in part 1. Peter From: John Cowan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 2:28 PM To: Peter Constable <[email protected]> Cc: Doug Ewell <[email protected]>; Michael Everson <[email protected]>; IETF Languages Discussion <[email protected]>; ISO639-3 <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Montenegrin has been given an ISO 639-3 code On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Peter Constable <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This is not coming into 639-3 by typical 639-3 process, but rather via 639-2 process. I was going to ask if the new code would be added to the "hbs" (aka "sh") macrolanguage, but I see that macrolanguage is no longer on the 639-2 page, though it is still in the 639-3 system. Does that mean that 639-2 has removed it? -- John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fvrici.lojban.org%2F~cowan&data=02%7C01%7Cpetercon%40microsoft.com%7C5267551f55984676217f08d52c7823e2%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636463816861118741&sdata=H0p8uj2BDzyBXnm%2Fuc%2Bpf6OrxR7KXNFpVTTY8z7s71c%3D&reserved=0> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> No, John. I want formats that are actually useful, rather than over- featured megaliths that address all questions by piling on ridiculous internal links in forms which are hideously over-complex. --Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages