Re: Montenegrin has been given an ISO 639-3 code

> Comments: sr, hr, bs, cnr are preferred for most modern uses

That is going a bit too far: sr, hr, bs, are more customary, but cnr is a
long way from being so, and may never be. We haven't decided what to do in
CLDR, for example, but for stability we might stick with sr-ME until
(/unless) cnr becomes more common. Probably aliasing cnr, like we do with
'mo'.

Mark <https://twitter.com/mark_e_davis>

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote:

> When [cnr] does appear on the ISO 639-2 and/or 639-3 code tables, which
> will trigger its addition to the Registry, I will propose including this
> field in the new 'cnr' record:
>
> Comments: see sr
>
> and adding this field to the existing 'sr' record:
>
> Comments: see cnr
>
> and probably also updating the Comments field in the existing 'sh' record:
>
> Comments: sr, hr, bs, cnr are preferred for most modern uses
>
>
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages