Re: Revised forms for Montenegrin (was: RE: Macrolanguage)

Kent Karlsson wrote:

> My preference is to delete those comments.

Fair enough. I think they would be helpful to users, but I don't insist 
on them. The Reviewer can decide, possibly with the input of others 
besides you and me. I'll wait for his decision before posting new forms.

> If that is not possible,

It is certainly possible. Comments fields are one place where we can 
recommend almost anything to the Reviewer, and he can approve almost 
anything, though I will predictably fight against lengthy encyclopedic 
or bibliographic references.

> please follow what is already in the registry for similar (and very
> terse) comments (and what you had in the first email you referenced,

viz. "Comments: see sr" and "Comments: see cnr".

> but complete not partial).

I don't understand. If this means "figure out every case in which a user 
would likely look up the wrong subtag, and add a cross-reference to the 
right one," I'm pretty sure nobody will take on that research project. 
There are almost 9,000 subtags in the Registry.

> I'm not at all trying to be obscure.

I don't suggest the obscurity was intentional.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org