Re: Missing M.49 code
Michael Everson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 20 Feb 2018, at 18:13, Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote: >> (b), (c) General-purpose software has come to depend on the LSTR for >> stable codes. Having a misalignment does nobody any good. > > Should we be talking about creating variant subtag 'sercq’? If there is evidence the dialect differs enough, that might be an option. Michael _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages