Re: Missing M.49 code

John Cowan wrote:

> The Maintenance Agency is ISO itself.  I contacted them about
> assigning an alphabetic code to Sark, but they told me to contact
> ANSI.  I have forwarded my request there.

Is this desired because

(a) there is actual linguistic content in Sercquiais (or the "Sark 
variety" of some other language) that needs to be tagged,

(b) because there is a desire to create CLDR locale data for Sark, or

(c) simply because CLDR somehow expects every UN M.49 code element to 
have a corresponding ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code element?

The latter, at least, would seem to be an artificial assumption.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org