Re: Armenian (was: Re: ISO 639-3 changes, part 3)
Michael Everson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
arevmda should certainly be deprecated with a pointer to hyw. That makes arevela redundant, since hy and hye/arm are Eastern Armenian. Hm, according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_language hye is “Modern Armenian” in 639-3. But Ethnologue just lists “Armenian” for hy and hye/arm. Same at https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/langcodes_name.php?code_ID=26 > On 8 Mar 2018, at 18:42, Arthur Reutenauer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 01:05:13PM -0700, Doug Ewell wrote: >> I don't personally need to relitigate the RA's decision that WA is a >> different enough language from EA to justify a separate code element. >> >> I just need to know whether one, both, or neither of the variant subtags >> for Armenian is to be deprecated, so I can prepare and post forms. > > Right. Sorry I contributed to revive that discussion. For what it’s > worth, I think it makes most sense to > > 1. Deprecate arevmda with a pointer to hyw > 2. Leave arevela as it is. > > (I think that’s what you were leaning towards in the first place.) > > Best, > > Arthur > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-languages mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages