Re: Armenian (was: Re: ISO 639-3 changes, part 3)
John Cowan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD2gp_Qz0rYoJt2VehMAZ22jLhAFrBV=3S+xxrHOa12u+-6uag@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:14 PM, Arthur Reutenauer < [email protected]> wrote: Of course it could have; by [hyx], for example. > 'hyx' is not a language code (it represents the Armenic language family, just as 'gem' represents the Germanic language family), and like other 639-5 codes, it cannot be used as a BCP 47 language tag. If the RA decides to create a macrolanguage code for Armenian (macrolanguage), that's another matter, but they haven't done so. -- John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan [email protected] But you, Wormtongue, you have done what you could for your true master. Some reward you have earned at least. Yet Saruman is apt to overlook his bargains. I should advise you to go quickly and remind him, lest he forget your faithful service. --Gandalf _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages