Re: Tibetan Ewts variant proposal (and related questions)
"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20180309091831.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.d37c777cf8.wbe@email03.godaddy.com> |
"Phillips, Addison" wrote: > Since this is a transliteration scheme, have you looked at the -t- > extension? This is a good point. It's perhaps worth noting that we have not registered a new subtag for a transliteration scheme (excluding phonetic alphabets) since 2011, when the T extension came into existence. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org